Examining Inter-disciplinary Commonalities in the Referents of I, We and You in Classroom Lecturer Talk
Issue: Vol.2 No.12 December 2021 Article 2 pp. 210 – 223
DOI : https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.20212122 | Published online 23rd December, 2021.
© 2021 The Author(s). This is an open access article under the CCBY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Studies have sought to establish the ‘territory of reference’ or ‘patterns of referentialities’ of I, we and you (tri-PP) in academic lectures across disciplinary supercommunities (DSs): Humanities, Social Sciences and Natural Sciences. These studies are largely from L1 context, and also report on only referents common to the three DSs, without giving attention to those at the interface of two DSs. This study, therefore, is the first attempt to examine the referents of the tri-PP at the interface of two DSs in academic lectures, using a corpus from the L2 context. A corpus of over one hundred thousand words was built for the study, and AntConc was used to search for the occurrences of the tri-PP. Drawing on the contexts and co-texts, the authors determined the referents of the tri-PP. It was found that across the tri-PP, some referents were shared by two DSs. The findings further deepen understanding of the ‘pointing’ role of personal pronouns in classroom lecturer talk and “degree of cross-disciplinary diversity…”
Keywords: academic lectures, discourse referent, disciplinary variation, personal
pronouns
Ädel, Annelie. Just to give you kind of a map of where we are going: A taxonomy of metadiscourse in spoken and written academic English. Nordic Journal of English Studies 9 no. 2, (2010): 69-97.
Ädel, Annelie. Metadiscourse in L1 and L2English. (Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 2006).
Afful, Joseph. Benjamin. A. The rhetoric of undergraduate student writing in a Ghanaian university: A cross disciplinary study. (Saarbrucken: Lambert Academic Publishing. 2010).
Akoto, Osei. Yaw. & Afful, Joseph. Benjamin. A. Variations in metadiscourse use in English Language introduction and literature review thesis chapters. Language Literacy 4 no. 2, (2020): 390-408.
Akoto, Osei. Yaw. & Amoakohene, Benjamin. Exploring wordless feedback mechanisms in an EAP course in an English-medium university: An ethnographically-oriented approach. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics 2 no. 4, (2020): 50-61.
Akoto, Osei. Yaw. Individualities in the referents of I, we, and you in academic lectures across disciplines. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9 no. 4: 1-14. (2020b).
Akoto, Osei. Yaw. Metadiscourse within a discipline: a study of introduction and literature review chapters of sociology masters’ theses. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics 10 no. 2, (2020a): 471-480.
Akoto, Osei. Yaw., Ansah, Juliet. O-A. & Fordjour, Emmanuel. A. Personal pronouns in classroom: a corpusbased study of I, we and you in university lectures across disciplines. Journal of Languages for Specific Purposes (JLSP) (2021): 53-66.
Anthony, Laurence. AntConc (version 3.5.0) [computer software]. (Tokyo, Japan: Wased University. Available from http://www.laurenceanthony.net 2015).
Baker, Paul., Costas, Gabrielatos., Majid, Khosravinik., Michał, Krzyżanowski., Tony, McEnery. & Wodak, Ruth. A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society 19 no. 3, (2008): 273-306.
Bakhtin, Mikhail. M. The dialogic imagination: four essays. (In M. Holquist, Ed.; & C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans. Austin: University of Texas Press. 1981).
Becher, Tony, and Paul Trowler. Academic tribes and territories (2nd ed.). (Buckingham: The Open University Press 2001).
Becher, Tony. The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education 19 no. 2, (1994):151- 161. doi: 10.1080/03075079412331382007.
Biber, Douglas. & Conrad, Susan. Register, genre, and style. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2009).
Biglan, Anthony. Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology 57 no. 3, (1973): 207-213.
Blackwell, James. W. The text-compositional architecture of university lectures: an exploration of genre and periodicity in spoken academic discourse Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). UK: The University of Birmingham. 2010).
Clerehan, Rosemary., Moore, Tim. & Vance, Sheila. Collaborating in the transition to tertiary writing. ASCILITE, (2001): 125-132.
Crawford Camiciottoli, Belinda. The languages of business studies lectures. (Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2007).
Fox, Gwyneth. A comparison of ‘policespeak’ and ‘normalspeak’: a preliminary study. In: J.M. Sinclair, M. Hoey and G. Fox (eds), Techniques of Description. Spoken and Written Discourse. A Festschrift for Malcolm Coulthard. (pp. 40-72). London & New York: Routledge. 1992).
Goffman, Erving. The presentation of self in everyday life. (New York: Doubleday Anchor. 1981).
Gyekye, Kwame. The Akan concept of a person. In A. R. Wright (Ed.). African Philosophy: an introduction (pp. 101-122). Lanham, Md.: University Press of America. 1984).http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/llwizard. html. Accessed 9 July).
Hyland, Ken. Academic discourse: English in a global context. (London: Continuum. 2009). Hyland, Ken. Authority and invisibility: authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics 34, (2002a):1091-1112.
Hyland, Ken. Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. (London: Longman. 2000).
Hyland, Ken. Options of identity in academic writing. ELT Journal 56 no. 4, (2002b): 351-358.
Hyland, Ken. Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7 no. 2, (2005): 173-192.
Jones, Stacy. H. The way we were, are and might be: torch singing as autoethnography. In A. P. Bochner & C. Ellis (Eds.) Ethnographically speaking: Autoethnography, Literature, and Aesthetics (pp. 44-56). Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press. 2002).
Kagan, Jerome. The three cultures: Natural sciences, social sciences, and the humanities in the 21st century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2009).
Kamio, Akio. English generic we, you, and they: An analysis in terms of territory of information. Journal of Pragmatics 33, (2001): 1111-1124.
Koester, Almut. Building small specialised corpus. (In A. O’Keeffe, & M McCarthy (Eds.). The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 66-79). London: Routledge. 2010).
Lee, Joseph. J. Size matters: an exploratory comparison of small and large class university lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes 28 no. 1, (2009): 42-57.
Literature review chapters. ESP World 57 no. 21, (2019):1-31.
MacDonald, Susan. P. Professional academic writing in the humanities and social sciences. (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. 1994).
McEnery, Tony. & Hardie, Andrew. Corpus Linguistics: Method, theory and practice. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2012).
Meyer, Charles. F. English corpus linguistics: an introduction. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2002).
O’keeffe, Anne., McCarthy, Michael. & Carter, Ronald. From corpus to classroom. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2007).
Querol-Julián, Mercedes. The role of questions in English academic lectures. Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics 14, (2008):100-111.
Rayson, Paul. (n.d.). Log-likelihood calculator [Computer Software]. (UK: Lancaster University.
Rounds, Patricia. L. Multifunctional personal pronouns use in educational setting. English for Specific Purposes 6 no 1, (1987): 13-29.
Scheibman, Joanne. Inclusive and exclusive patterning of the English first person plural: Evidence from conversation. Language, Culture and Mind, (2004): 377-396.
Simpson, Rita., Briggs, Sarah., Ovens, Janine., & Swales, John. M. The Michigan corpus of academic spoken English. (Ann Arbor: The Regents of the University of Michigan. 2002).
Sinclair, John. & Carter, Roland. Trust the text: language, corpus and discourse. (New York: Routledge. 2004).
Tuathail, Gearóid. Ó., & Agnew, John. Geopolitics and discourse: practical geopolitical reasoning in American foreign policy. Political Geography 11 no. 2, (1992): 190-204.
Yaakob, Salmah Binti. A genre analysis and corpus-based study of university lecture introductions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. (The University of Birmingham, UK 2013).
Yeo, Jiin-Yih, & Su-Hie Ting. Personal pronouns for student engagement in arts and science lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes 34, (2014): 26-37.
Zhihua, Guo. The use of personal pronouns in university lectures. (Paper presented at University of Applied Sciences Language Structure and Language Learning Conference. 2011) http://fl.hs.yzu.edu.tw/wlsll/ppt/16.pdf 25/July/2015
Osei Yaw Akoto (PhD) is a lecturer in the Department of English, Faculty of Social Sciences, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana. He holds B.A (Hons) in English Language and Philosophy; M.Phil. and PhD in English Language, all from the University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana. He teaches courses like English for Academic Purposes, Sociolinguistics, Discourse Studies and Error Analysis. His research interest includes Linguistic Landscape, Onomastics, Corpus Linguistics and Academic Discourse. His recent publication appeared in Word.
Dr. Benjamin Amoakohene is a Lecturer at the Department of General and Liberal Studies of the University of Health and Allied Sciences, where he teaches Academic and Communicative Skills. He had his terminal degree in Applied Linguistics from the University of the Western Cape, South Africa. Before becoming a Lecturer at the University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dr. Benjamin Amoakohene had served as a Teaching Assistant at the Department of English and the Department of Communication Studies of the University of Cape Coast. He has had the privilege to serve as the Examination Officer and the Acting Head of Department at the Department of General and Liberal Studies of the University of Health and Allied Sciences at different times. His areas of research are Genre Studies, Discourse Analysis and Sociolinguistics. He is a member of the Systemic Functional Linguistics group, Ghana and the Linguistic Association of Ghana. He is currently the Organizer for the Ghana Names Society.
Juliet Oppong-Asare Ansah is a lecturer in the Department of Language and Communication Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana. She holds Bachelor of Education in Psychology and Master of Philosophy in Ghanaian Language (both from the University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast Ghana). Currently, she is a PhD candidate in Linguistics at the University of Ghana, Legon, Accra-Ghana. She has been teaching courses like Semantics, Aesthetics of Oral Literature, Translation, Creative Writing, Pragmatics and Akan Written Expression. Her research interest includes Ethnographic Linguistics, Diachronic Studies, Semantics and its interfaces, Language Contact and Translation Studies. Her latest article published by Noyam is on the use of persuasion in Christian fundraising
Akoto O.Y. , Oppong-Asare J.A. & Amoakohene B., “Examining Inter-disciplinary Commonalities in the Referents of I, We and You in Classroom Lecturer Talk,” E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences 2, no.12 (2021): 210-223. https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.20212122
© 2021 The Author(s). Published and Maintained by Noyam Publishers. This is an open access article under the CCBY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).