Experiences of Using a Real Compound Microscope and a Virtual Compound Microscope in Understanding Plant Tissues by First-year Life Science Students at a Tertiary Institution in South Africa

Vuyokazi Momoti ORCID iD, Sakyiwaa Boateng ORCID iD and Thamsanqa Sihele ORCID iD

Issue: Vol.5  No.4 Issue Article 3 pp.393-401
DOI: https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.2024543 |   Published online 5th April, 2024
© 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article under the CCBY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Views: 231
104 Downloads

DOWNLOAD PDF

During the COVID-19 outbreak, the majority of tertiary institutions preferred virtual laboratories to face-to-face laboratories which posed a challenge to many students. The objective of the study was to examine students’ experiences at a higher institution using both a physical and virtual microscope. This qualitative study involved ten randomly chosen first-year Life Science students. They had to prepare and view onion cells under a real microscope, while the second assignment required them to observe onion cell preparation in a virtual laboratory. Students completed a questionnaire containing open-ended questions. The results were analyzed using themes, and the study found that pupils prefer physical microscopes to virtual microscopes. This is because students interact with the equipment in the laboratory, which encourages intellectual interests, knowledge sharing, and the development of social connections. Students can manipulate actual objects, manually focus microscopes, and interact in real time with microscopic worlds. This hands-on expertise is critical for instructing students and researchers on laboratory practices. Real microscopes are versatile pieces of equipment that can be utilized for a wide range of applications, from basic instruction to advanced research. Although virtual microscopes have advanced in terms of image quality, real microscopes provide better resolution and clarity. The study will make a substantial addition to university laboratory pedagogies and expose students to scientific investigations, given the majority of students come from rural schools with limited laboratory equipment such as microscopes.

Keywords: Physical Microscope, Virtual Microscope, Experiences, Intellectual Interest, Social Interactions

Ambusaidi, Abdullah, Ali Al Musawi, Sulaiman Al-Balushi, and Khadija Al-Balushi. “The Impact of Virtual Lab Learning Experiences on 9th Grade Students’ Achievement and Their Attitudes towards Science and Learning by Virtual Lab.” Journal of Turkish Science Education 15, no. 2 (2018): 13–29.

Caruso, Maria C. “Virtual Microscopy and Other Technologies for Teaching Histology during Covid‐19.” Anatomical Sciences Education 14, no. 1 (2021): 19.

Delgado, Tracie, Shun‐Je Bhark, and Joshua Donahue. “Pandemic Teaching: Creating and Teaching Cell Biology Labs Online during COVID‐19.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 49, no. 1 (2021): 32–37.

Eidesen, Pernille Bronken, Anne E Bjune, and Simone I Lang. “‘Show Me How to Use a Microscope’–The Development and Evaluation of Certification as Direct Assessment of Practical Lab Skills.” Ecology and Evolution 13, no. 10 (2023): e10592.

Fadzil, Hidayah Mohd, and Rohaida Mohd Saat. “Exploring Students’ Acquisition of Manipulative Skills during Science Practical Work.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 13, no. 8 (2017): 4591–4607.

Fajarini, Nata Maulida, Endah Peniati, and Muhammad Abdullah. “The Effect of Microscope Skills On The Observation Results Of Plant Tissue Preparations by Students Of SMAN 4 Tegal.” Journal of Biology Education 9, no. 3 (2020): 234–44.

Herodotou, C., M. Aristeidou, E. Scanlon, and S. Kelley. “Virtual Microscopes and Online Learning: Exploring the Perceptions of 12 Teachers about Pedagogy.” Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, August 13, 2022, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2022.2112661.

Kadirberdievna, Bekmetova Shoxida. “Increase the Effectiveness of Education in Biology Classes Using a Digital Microscope.” JournalNX 6, no. 11 (2020): 85–92.

Michels, Kristin K, Zachary D Michels, and Sara C Hotchkiss. “Advantages of Live Microscope Video for Laboratory and Teaching Applications.” Natural Sciences Education 45, no. 1 (2016): 1–5.

Rayment, Sarah, Karin Garrie, Ishwinder Kaur, Gareth McVicker, Emma Storey, Jody Winter, Luigi A De Girolamo, Callum Rimmer, David Negus, and Carl Nelson. “Investigating Student Engagement and Making Science Real during a Pandemic: Bioskills at Home, a Case Study.” Education Sciences 12,no.2 (2022):106.

Reeves, Shalaunda M, and Kent J Crippen. “Virtual Laboratories in Undergraduate Science and Engineering Courses: A Systematic Review, 2009–2019.” Journal of Science Education and Technology30(2021):16–30.

Yilmaz, Kara. “Determining the Effects of Microscope Simulation on Achievement, Ability, Reports, and Opinions about Microscope in General Biology Laboratory Course,” 2018.

Ms. V. Momoti is a Laboratory Instructor in Botany and Zoology and a Researcher at the Faculty of Education – Walter Sisulu University, South Africa.

Dr. S. Boateng is a Senior Lecturer specializing in Physical Sciences Teaching and a Researcher at the Faculty of Education – Walter Sisulu University, South Africa.

Mr. T. Sihele is a Lecturer specializing in Life Sciences Teaching and a Researcher at the Faculty of Education – Walter Sisulu University, South Africa.

Momoti,Vuyokazi, Sakyiwaa Boateng and Thamsanqa Sihele.“Experiences of Using a Real Compound Microscope and a Virtual Compound Microscope in Understanding Plant Tissues by First-year Life Science Students at a Tertiary Institution in South Africa,” E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences 5, no.4 (2024): 393-401. https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.2024543

© 2024 The Author(s). Published and Maintained by Noyam Journals. This is an open access article under the CCBY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Articles in this Issue

About Journal