Learner Discipline and Democratic Rights: Stakeholders’ Perspectives on the Effectiveness of Discipline Policies
Ntsako Shereen Moremi 
& Mahlapahlapana Themane
Issue: Vol.5 No.8 Issue Article 10 pp.1555 – 1564
DOI: https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.20245810 | Published online 6th August, 2024
© 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article under the CCBY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
This article investigated how school stakeholders perceive the effectiveness of current policies and government Acts on learner discipline. Learner ill-disciplined behaviour is a daily occurrence in today’s classrooms. The question addressed was: What are the stakeholders’ perspectives on the effectiveness of the current policies and government Acts on learner discipline? To answer this question, the study adopted the qualitative approach and a case study design. 12 participants were recruited using the purposive non-probability sampling approach from three primary schools in Rakwadu 1 Circuit, Limpopo Province, South Africa. The sample comprised three principals, three departmental heads involved in the school disciplinary committees, three class teachers, and three representatives of the school’s governing body. Data was gathered using interviews and document analysis. Bandura’s Social Cognitive Learning Theory underpinned the study. The study found that policies and government Acts on learner discipline were ineffective. They failed to help schools to successfully manage ill-discipline. It was also found that stakeholders had inadequate knowledge of policies and government Acts on discipline. It was recommended that the Basic Education Department provide training to school stakeholders regarding policies and government Acts pertaining to learner discipline. The paper will contribute significantly to transformative scholarship on the promotion of teaching and learning. The article may also be helpful to stakeholders who are hard-pressed to find answers for their schools.
Keywords: Learner Discipline, Democratic Rights, Discipline Policies,Ill-Discipline, Stakeholders
Bandura, A, and P Hall. “Albert Bandura and Social Learning Theory.” Learning Theories for Early Years 78 (2018).
Bandura, Albert, and Richard H Walters. Social Learning Theory. Vol. 1. Englewood cliffs Prentice Hall, 1977.
Bussu, Sonia, Mirza Lalani, Stephen Pattison, and Martin Marshall. “Engaging with Care: Ethical Issues in Participatory Research.” Qualitative Research 21, no. 5 (2021): 667–85.
Buys, Irma. “A Restorative Approach towards School Discipline and Behavioural Conduct in South African Schools: A Case Study.” University of South Africa, 2018.
Campbell, Steve, Melanie Greenwood, Sarah Prior, Toniele Shearer, Kerrie Walkem, Sarah Young, Danielle Bywaters, and Kim Walker. “Purposive Sampling: Complex or Simple? Research Case Examples.” Journal of Research in Nursing 25, no. 8 (2020): 652–61.
DeJonckheere, Melissa, and Lisa M Vaughn. “Semistructured Interviewing in Primary Care Research: A Balance of Relationship and Rigour.” Family Medicine and Community Health 7, no. 2 (2019).
Dlamini, Goodwill Sifiso. “The Role of School Governing Bodies in Managing Learner Discipline in No-Fee Public Schools.” University of Johannesburg, 2022.
Fosu-Ayarkwah, Charles. “Counselling as a Critical Tool in Managing Ill-Discipline in Colleges of Education in Ghana.” Open Journal of Educational Research, 2022, 197–212.
Gibbs, Graham R. “Analyzing Qualitative Data,” 2018.
Jinot, Belle Louis. “The Causes of a Lack of Discipline among Secondary School Learners in Mauritius.” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 9, no. 1 (2018).
Khoa, Bui Thanh, Bui Phu Hung, and Mohsen Hejsalem-Brahmi. “Qualitative Research in Social Sciences: Data Collection, Data Analysis and Report Writing.” International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management 12, no. 1–2 (2023): 187–209.
Lemon, Laura L, and Jameson Hayes. “Enhancing Trustworthiness of Qualitative Findings: Using Leximancer for Qualitative Data Analysis Triangulation.” The Qualitative Report 25, no. 3 (2020): 604–14.
Makendano, Aggrey Kayabu, and Vimbi Petrus Mahlangu. “Learner Discipline versus Learner Freedom in Secondary Schools.” Sjesr 4, no. 4 (2021): 1–9.
Maphosa, Cosmas, and Almon Shumba. “Educators’ Disciplinary Capabilities after the Banning of Corporal Punishment in South African Schools.” South African Journal of Education 30, no. 3 (2010).
Mareš, Jiří. “Students’ Indiscipline in the Classroom.” Pedagogická Orientace 28, no. 4 (2018): 556–98.
Mashau, T S, H N Mutshaeni, and L R Kone. “Learner Discipline: Finding Lawful Alternatives to Corporal Punishment (Learner Discipline).” International Journal of Educational Sciences 11, no. 3 (2015): 285–90.
Mfaume, Hamisi, and Margareth Bilinga. “Prevalence of Teachers’ Professional Malpractices in Tanzanian Public Secondary Schools: What Ought to Be Done?.” Journal of Education and Training Studies 5, no. 2 (2017): 43–52.
Mnisi, Phephelaphi Matilda. “Teachers’ Perceptions of Learner Discipline in the Intermediate Phase Schools of the Sikhulile Circuit: Enhlazeni Region in Mpumalanga Province,” 2021.
Motseke, Masilonyana. “Managing Ill-Discipline among Learners in Disadvantaged Schools.” Africa Education Review 17, no. 3 (2020): 22–36.
Nhlapho, Thembinkosi Lennox. “Exploring the Implementation of Discipline Policy: A Case Study of Three Primary Schools at Isipingo Circuit,” 2018.
Obadire, Olufunmilayo Tenidade, and Dzivhonele Albert Sinthumule. “Learner Discipline in the Post-Corporal Punishment Era: What an Experience!” South African Journal of Education 41, no. 2 (2021).
Republic of South Africa. South African Schools Act, No 84 of 1996. Pretoria: Government Printers, 1996.
Segalo, Letlhoyo, and Awelani Melvin Rambuda. “South African Public School Teachers’ Views on Right to Discipline Learners.” South African Journal of Education 38, no. 2 (2018): 1–7.
Simuforosa, M, and N Rosemary. “Learner Indiscipline in Schools.” Review of Arts and Humanities 3, no. 2 (2014): 79–88.
South Africa. South African Schools Act. Pretoria: Government Printers, 1996.
Terry, Gareth, and Nikki Hayfield. Essentials of Thematic Analysis. American Psychological Association, 2021.
Tshabalala, Thembinkosi, Augustine Zano Muranda, and Philip Gazimbe Gazimbe. “Challenges Faced by School Heads in Handling Teacher Disciplinary Issues in Primary Schools in Umguza District.” Nova Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 3, no. 4 (2016).
Wet, Annamagriet De, and Charles J Russo. “Discipline and Learner Rights: Guidelines for School Governing Bodies and Educators.” Journal of Education Studies 8, no. 1 (2009): 7–20.
Moremi Ntsako Shereen is a Departmental Head at a Primary school in Rakwadu 1 Circuit. She holds a Master’s degree in Education. Her research interests include curriculum studies, early child development, and learner safety and discipline in primary schools.
Professor Themane is the NRF SARCHi Research Chair at schools as Enabling Environment at the University of Limpopo. His research interests include curriculum studies, inclusive education, student health and well-being areas for care and support for teaching and learning.
Moremi, Ntsako Shereen & Mahlapahlapana Themane. “Learner Discipline and Democratic Rights: Stakeholders’ Perspectives on the Effectiveness of Discipline Policies,” E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences 5, no.8 (2024): 1555 – 1564. https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.20245810
© 2024 The Author(s). Published and Maintained by Noyam Journals. This is an open access article under the CCBY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
