Bridging Academic Publishing and Real-world Impact: A Rubric from Rural-oriented Research Lenses

Bridging Academic Publishing and Real-world Impact: A Rubric from Rural-oriented Research Lenses

Ishmael Obaeko Iwara

Issue: Vol. 6 No. 12 2025 Article 4 pp. 1366 – 1384
DOI : https://doi.org/10.38159/jelt.202561210 | Published online 30th December, 2025.
© 2025 The Author(s). This is an open access article under the CCBY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

40 Downloads

DOWNLOAD PDF

ABSTRACT

Academic publishing aims to disseminate new knowledge and innovative discoveries effectively. This requires a balance of brevity and thoroughness in expressing insightful ideas, as well as scientific advancements for sustainable development. Nonetheless, the impact of academic writing is frequently compromised by redundancy and the publication of inconsequential research, which undermines stakeholders’ commitment to research initiatives and pioneering contributions that are pertinent and impactful to societal and scholarly domains. This remains a pervasive challenge in higher education that stakeholders or institutions globally strive to develop effective solutions. Drawing on perspectives from eight scholars (three Professors, two Associate Professors, and three Postdoctoral research fellows), currently affiliated with public universities in South Africa and with a significant level of research advancement in rural sociology, this case study proposes a rubric for measuring relevance in academic writing within rural-oriented higher learning institutions. The findings, based on qualitative data collected using a semi-structured questionnaire, highlighted five fundamental criteria: applicability, commercialisation, cutting-edge, novelty and social impact. The significance of the rubric lies in its capacity to facilitate critical assessments of research before implementation, thereby streamlining an effective research landscape. Its implementation will guide future academic writing toward ethical and meaningful contributions. An empirical inquiry that quantifies the relative significance of criteria in the rubric will help determine their importance and the level of emphasis required for an academic publication to be deemed relevant.

Keywords: Academic writing, higher learning, redundant publishing, research relevance, rural development

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Anderson, C. A., and J. Dron. “The Impact of Digital Technologies on Teaching and Learning.” Education and Information Technologies 24, no. 2 (2019): 1127–46.

Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. “Thematic Analysis.” In APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology: Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological (Vol. 2) (2nd Ed.), 65–81. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000319-004.

Caponetto, I. “Gamification in Education: A Review of Research and Emerging Trends.” Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 48, no. 2 (2020): 233–54.

Collins, L., and H. Higgs. “Co-Constructed Learning and Digital Tools in Teacher Mentoring.” Journal of Educational Technology 40, no. 2 (2023): 156–70.

Creswell, J. W., and C. N. Poth. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications, 2018.

Dichev, Christo, and Darina Dicheva. “Gamifying Education: What Is Known, What Is Believed and What Remains Uncertain: A Critical Review.” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 14, no.1(December 20, 2017): 9.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5.

Dickey, M., and T. Kim. “ Explorina

Ab Aziz, Kamarulzaman, Hezlin Harris, Salmi Md Zahid, and Nor Azlina Ab Aziz. “Commercialisation of University Research: An Investigation of Researchers’ Behaviour.” Communications of the IBIMA 2013 (2013): 1.

Bornmann, Lutz. “What Is Societal Impact of Research and How Can It Be Assessed? A Literature Survey.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64, no. 2 (February 17, 2013): 217–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22803.

Buckley, Ralf. “Originality in Research Publication: Measure, Concept, or Skill?” Journal of Travel Research 62, no. 5 (2023): 1159–63.

Callaghan, Chris William, and Denise Rosemary Nicholson. “Predatory Publishing and Predatory Journals: A Critical Review and Proposed Research Agenda for Higher Education.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 44, no. 10 (2020): 1433–49.

Charles, David. “The Rural University Campus and Support for Rural Innovation.” Science and Public Policy 43, no. 6 (December 2016): 763–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw017.

Crotty, D. “The Value of Redundancy in Research, or in Research, Redundancy Has Value.” The Scholarly Kitchen, 2019.

Dalen, Hendrik P Van, and Kène Henkens. “Intended and Unintended Consequences of a Publish‐or‐perish Culture: A Worldwide Survey.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63, no. 7 (2012): 1282–93.

Elmore, Susan A, and Eleanor H Weston. “Predatory Journals: What They Are and How to Avoid Them.” Toxicologic Pathology 48, no. 4 (2020): 607–10.

Elsevier. “ Elsevier Research Intelligence,” 2023. https://www.elsevier.com.

Fecher, Benedikt, and Marcel Hebing. “How Do Researchers Approach Societal Impact?” Plos One 16, no. 7 (2021): e0254006.

Gogtay, Nithya. “Redundant Publications.” In Reporting and Publishing Research in the Biomedical Sciences, 233–40. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7062-4_23.

Golosovsky, Michael, and Vincent Larivière. “Uncited Papers Are Not Useless.” Quantitative Science Studies 2, no. 3 (2021): 899–911.

Habibzadeh, F., and M. A. Winker. “Duplicate Publication and Plagiarism: Causes and Cures.” Notfall + Rettungsmedizin 12, no. 6 (October 3, 2009): 415–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-009-1229-7.

Hall, Kara L, Amanda L Vogel, and Robert T Croyle. “Strategies for Team Science Success.” Springer International Publishing. Doi 10 (2019): 973–78.

Ioannidis, John P A. “How to Make More Published Research True.” Revista Cubana de Información En Ciencias de La Salud (ACIMED) 26, no. 2 (2015): 187–200.

Irlam, J., and C. M. L. West. “Time to Rethink Commercialisation: Spin out or Lose Out?” Clinical Oncology 34, no. 7 (2022): 439–41.

Ismail, Norain, Mohd Jailani Mohd Nor, and Safiah Sidek. “A Framework for a Successful Research Products Commercialisation: A Case of Malaysian Academic Researchers.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 195 (2015): 283–92.

Iwara, Ishmael Obaeko, and Beata Mukina Kilonzo. “Towards a Conceptual Understanding of an Effective Rural-Based Entrepreneurial University in South Africa.” Social Sciences 11, no. 9 (2022): 388.

Kipo-Sunyehzi, Daniel Dramani. “Implementation Research in Developed and Developing Countries: An Analysis of the Trends and Directions.” Public Organization Review 23, no. 3 (September 10, 2023): 1259–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-022-00659-0.

Knöchelmann, Marcel. “Formal Authorship in the Wake of Uncertain Futures: The Narrative of Publish or Perish in the Humanities.” Research Evaluation 33 (July 22, 2024). https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvae044.

Koskela, Lauri. “Why Is Management Research Irrelevant?” Construction Management and Economics 35, no. 1–2 (2017): 4–23.

Laine, Christine, and Margaret A. Winker. “Identifying Predatory or Pseudo-Journals.” Biochemia Medica 27, no. 2 (June 15, 2017): 285–91. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.031.

Laperche, Blandine. “The Four Key Factors for Commercialising Research.” The Case of A, 2002.

Lund, Hans, Karen A Robinson, Ane Gjerland, Hanna Nykvist, Thea Marie Drachen, Robin Christensen, Carsten Bogh Juhl, Gro Jamtvedt, Monica Nortvedt, and Merete Bjerrum. “Meta-Research Evaluating Redundancy and Use of Systematic Reviews When Planning New Studies in Health Research: A Scoping Review.” Systematic Reviews 11, no. 1 (2022): 241.

Mansilla, Veronica Boix, Elizabeth Dawes Duraisingh, Christopher R Wolfe, and Carolyn Haynes. “Targeted Assessment Rubric: An Empirically Grounded Rubric for Interdisciplinary Writing.” The Journal of Higher Education 80, no. 3 (2009): 334–53.

McNie, Elizabeth C., Adam Parris, and Daniel Sarewitz. “Improving the Public Value of Science: A Typology to Inform Discussion, Design and Implementation of Research.” Research Policy 45, no. 4 (May 2016): 884–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.004.

Munafò, Marcus R, Brian A Nosek, Dorothy V M Bishop, Katherine S Button, Christopher D Chambers, Nathalie Percie du Sert, Uri Simonsohn, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Jennifer J Ware, and John P A Ioannidis. “A Manifesto for Reproducible Science.” Nature Human Behaviour 1, no. 1 (2017): 0021.

Muraleedharan, Aparna, and B Aravinda Kumar. “The Malady of Redundant Publications: Common yet Poorly Understood.” Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine. Medknow, 2022.

Muriisa, Roberts Kabeba. “Rethinking the Role of Universities in Africa: Leadership as a Missing Link in Explaining University Performance in Uganda.” Journal of Higher Education in Africa/Revue de l’enseignement Superieur En Afrique 12, no. 1 (2014): 69–92.

OECD. “Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development,” 2022. https://doi.org/10.1787/sti_outlook-2022-en.

Omamo, Steven Were. “Bridging Research, Policy, and Practice in African Agriculture,” 2004.

Panda, Abinash, and Rajen K. Gupta. “Making Academic Research More Relevant: A Few Suggestions.” IIMB Management Review 26, no. 3 (September 2014): 156–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2014.07.008.

Pellecchia, Melanie, David S Mandell, Heather J Nuske, Gazi Azad, Courtney Benjamin Wolk, Brenna B Maddox, Erica M Reisinger, Laura C Skriner, Danielle R Adams, and Rebecca Stewart. “Community–Academic Partnerships in Implementation Research.” Journal of Community Psychology 46, no. 7 (2018): 941–52.

Piwowar, Heather, Jason Priem, Vincent Larivière, Juan Pablo Alperin, Lisa Matthias, Bree Norlander, Ashley Farley, Jevin West, and Stefanie Haustein. “The State of OA: A Large-Scale Analysis of the Prevalence and Impact of Open Access Articles.” PeerJ 6 (2018): e4375.

Puljak, Livia, and Hans Lund. “Definition, Harms, and Prevention of Redundant Systematic Reviews.” Systematic Reviews 12, no. 1 (April 4, 2023): 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02191-8.

Ragupathi, Kiruthika, and Adrian Lee. “Beyond Fairness and Consistency in Grading: The Role of Rubrics in Higher Education.” In Diversity and Inclusion in Global Higher Education: Lessons from across Asia, 73–95. Springer Singapore Singapore, 2020.

Ravenscroft, James, Maria Liakata, Amanda Clare, and Daniel Duma. “Measuring Scientific Impact beyond Academia: An Assessment of Existing Impact Metrics and Proposed Improvements.” PloS One 12, no. 3 (2017): e0173152.

Rawat, Seema, and Sanjay Meena. “Publish or Perish: Where Are We Heading?” Journal of Research in Medical Sciences: The Official Journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 19, no. 2 (2014): 87.

Reddy, Y Malini, and Heidi Andrade. “A Review of Rubric Use in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35, no. 4 (2010): 435–48.

Snyder, Hannah. “Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines.” Journal of Business Research 104 (2019): 333–39.

Tetnowski, Jennifer. “Qualitative Case Study Research Design.” Perspectives on Fluency and Fluency Disorders 25, no. 1 (2015): 39–45.

Tikhonova, Elena, Daria Mezentseva, and Peter Kasatkin. “Text Redundancy in Academic Writing: A Systematic Scoping Review.” Journal of Language and Education 10, no. 3 (39) (2024): 128–60.

Tweheyo, Gregory, Ernest Abaho, and Anju M Verma. “The Commercialisation of University Research Outputs: A Review of Literature.” Texila International Journal of Management 8, no. 2 (2022): 1–19.

Vasconcelos, Sonia Maria Ramos de, and Miguel Roig. “Prior Publication and Redundancy in Contemporary Science: Are Authors and Editors at the Crossroads?” Science and Engineering Ethics 21, no. 5 (2015): 1367–78.

Wager, Elizabeth. “Why Is Redundant Publication a Problem?” The International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 6, no. 1 (2015): 3.

Wagner, Caroline S, Travis A Whetsell, and Satyam Mukherjee. “International Research Collaboration: Novelty, Conventionality, and Atypicality in Knowledge Recombination.” Research Policy 48, no. 5 (2019): 1260–70.

Wnuk, Urszula, Adam Mazurkiewicz, and Beata Poteralska. “Commercialisation Strategies: Choosing the Right Route to Commercialise Your Research Results.” In European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 869. Academic Conferences International Limited, 2016.

Woldegiyorgis, Ayenachew Aseffa. “Harmonization of Higher Education in Africa and Europe: Policy Convergence at Supranational Level.” Tuning Journal for Higher Education 5, no. 2 (2018): 133–57.

Yadav, S. K. “ Redundant Publications.” In Research and Publication Ethics, 95–107. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023.

Yadav, Santosh Kumar. “Redundant Publications.” In Research and Publication Ethics, 95–107. Springer, 2023.

Yamada, Yuki. “How to Protect the Credibility of Articles Published in Predatory Journals.” Publications 9, no. 1 (January 24, 2021): 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010004.

g EGamification in Teacher Education: Transforming Pedagogy through Digital Engagement.” Teaching and Teacher Education 48, no. 1 (2024): 102–15.

González, C., J. C. Burguillo, and M. Llamas. “Gamifying Education: Classcraft’s Impact on Classroom Engagement.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 24, no. 4 (2021): 72–84.

Gravett, S, and F Cilliers. “Mentorship in Teacher Education: Reflecting on Practice and Progress.” Journal of Teacher Education 73, no. 1 (2022): 39–56.

Harrison, D. “ Improving Teacher Quality: The Role of Mentoring in Professional Development.” Teachers and Teaching 27, no. 6 (2021): 578–93.

Johnson, H, and P Nguyen. “Digital Mentorship: Enhancing Teaching and Learning through Technology.” Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 37,no.2(2021): 57–69.

Jones, A, and D Thomas. “The Role of Mentorship in Teacher Education: Best Practices and Challenges.” Journal of Education 198, no. 5 (2019): 100–113.

Koivisto, Jonna, and Juho Hamari. “The Rise of Motivational Information Systems: A Review of Gamification Research.” International Journal of Information Management 45 (April 2019): 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.013.

Landers, R. N, E. M Auer, A. B Collmus, and M. B Armstrong. “Gamification of Learning and Instruction: A Decade of Progress in Theory, Research, and Practice.” International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 14, no. 1 (2022): 1–18.

Mphojane, D. “Building Professional Capital in Teacher Education: The Role of Mentoring.” South African Journal of Education 39, no. 4 (2019): 112–29.

Rusznyak, Lee. “Teacher Choices in Action: An Emergent Pedagogical Response and Intervention,” 111–31, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12718-2_7.

Smith, J, and R Lewis. “Scaling Mentorship in Teacher Education: Addressing the Challenges of Large Cohorts.” International Journal of Teacher Education 36, no. 3 (2020): 210–25.

Vygotsky, L. S. “The Role of Play in Development.” Mind in Society/Harvard University Press, 1978.

AUTHOR(S)

Dr. Ishmael Obeko Iwara, a rated scholar by the South African National Research Foundation (NRF), is a development economist whose research interests intersect rural sociology, business efficacy, and the transformation of higher education, particularly within the entrepreneurial university context.

TO CITE ARTICLE

Iwara, Ishmael Obaeko. “Bridging Academic Publishing and Real-world Impact: A Rubric from Rural-oriented Research Lenses.” Journal of Education and Learning Technology 6, no. 12 (2025): 1366 – 1384. https://doi.org/10.38159/jelt.202561210