
A Systematic Review of Effectiveness and Factors Affecting the Usage of Virtual Science Laboratories in High Schools
Issue: Vol.6 No. 9 2025 Article 1 pp.696 – 713
DOI : https://doi.org/10.38159/jelt.2025691 | Published online 12th September, 2025.
© 2025 The Author(s). This is an open access article under the CCBY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
The integration of virtual laboratories (VLs) into school curricula has become widely accepted, with empirical studies demonstrating their effectiveness based on students’ academic performance in various science subjects across different countries. However, a comprehensive analysis of their combined effectiveness has yet to be conducted, as noted in this review. Using the PRISMA guidelines, six databases were searched, resulting in the identification of 4,180 relevant articles. Ultimately, 13 articles were selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The findings revealed that 38.46% of the studies focused on virtual Physics labs, 38.46% on Chemistry, and 23.08% on Biology. The studies indicated a significant improvement in students’ performance in VLs. As compared to traditional ones. Factors such as gender, attitude, and school type were found to influence students’ success with virtual labs. The study contributes to the existing research on individual and school factors affecting the adoption of new technology. Therefore, it is recommended that VLs be utilized either independently or alongside traditional labs, with particular attention given to female students. The study contributes to existing literature that enhances understanding of the significance and effectiveness of different types of science laboratories.
Keywords: Virtual laboratory, Physics, Biology, Chemistry.
Alhashem, Fatimah, and Abdullah Alfailakawi. “Technology-Enhanced Learning through Virtual Laboratories in Chemistry Education.” Contemporary Educational Technology 15, no. 4 (October 1, 2023): ep474. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13739.
Ambusaidi, Abdullah, Ali Al Musawi, Sulaiman Al-Balushi, and Khadija Al-Balushi. “The Impact of Virtual Lab Learning Experiences on 9th Grade Students’ Achievement and Their Attitudes towards Science and Learning by Virtual Lab.” Journal of Turkish Science Education 15, no. 2 (2018): 13–29.
Bajpai, Manisha, and Anil Kumar. “Effect of Virtual Laboratory on Students’ Conceptual Achievement in Physics.” International Journal of Current Research 7, no. 2 (2015): 12808–13.
Byukusenge, Céline, Florien Nsanganwimana, and Albert Paulo Tarmo. “Effectiveness of Virtual Laboratories in Teaching and Learning Biology: A Review of Literature.” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research 21, no. 6 (June 30, 2022): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.6.1.
———. “Investigating the Effect of Virtual Laboratories on Students’ Academic Performance and Attitudes towards Learning Biology.” Education and Information Technologies 29, no. 1 (2024): 1147–71.
Diwakar, Shyam, Rakhi Radhamani, Gopika Sujatha, Hemalatha Sasidharakurup, Akhila Shekhar, Krishnashree Achuthan, Prema Nedungadi, Raghu Raman, and Bipin Nair. “Usage and Diffusion of Biotechnology Virtual Labs for Enhancing University Education in India’s Urban and Rural Areas.” In Virtual Reality in Education: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice, 433–53. IGI Global, 2019.
Erven H. Mosqueda, Clint. “Effect of Utilizing Interactive Virtual Lab on Students Performance in Physics.” International Journal of Advanced Research 11, no. 05 (May 31, 2023): 1718–41. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/17041.
Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre (EPPI Center). “Guidelines for the extraction of information and quality assessment of primary studies in educational research. “Guidelines for the Extraction of Information and Quality Assessment of Primary Studies in Educational Research,” 2003. https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Resources/Tools/tabid/184/Default. aspx#Guidelines.
Ezrailson, Cathy Mariotti. “Danger in the School Science Lab: Are Students At Risk?” In Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science, Vol. 92, 2013.
Fishbein, Martin, and Icek Ajzen. Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. Psychology press, 2011.
Gambari, Amosa Isiaka, Halima Kawu, and Oluwole Caleb Falode. “Impact of Virtual Laboratory on the Achievement of Secondary School Chemistry Students in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Collaborative Environments.” Contemporary Educational Technology 9, no. 3 (July 16, 2018): 246–63. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.444108.
Hamed, Ghadeer, and Ahmad Aljanazrah. “The Effectiveness of Using Virtual Experiments on Students’ Learning in the General Physics Lab.” Journal of Information Technology Education: Research 19 (2020): 977–96. https://doi.org/10.28945/4668.
Hermansyah, H, G Gunawan, A Harjono, and R Adawiyah. “Guided Inquiry Model with Virtual Labs to Improve Students’ Understanding on Heat Concept.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1153 (February 2019): 012116. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1153/1/012116.
Hofstein, A., M. Kipnis, and I. Abrahams. Teaching Chemistry – A Study Book. Sense Publishers: Rotterdam, 2013.
Hofstein, Avi, and Per M. Kind. “Learning In and From Science Laboratories.” In Second International Handbook of Science Education, 189–207. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_15.
Hofstein, Avi, and Vincent N. Lunetta. “The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty‐first Century.” Science Education 88, no. 1 (January 3, 2004): 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106.
Ibrahim, Dogan. “Engineering Simulation with MATLAB: Improving Teaching and Learning Effectiveness.” Procedia Computer Science 3 (2011): 853–58.
Jimoyiannis, Athanassios, Panagiotis Tsiotakis, Dimitrios Roussinos, and Anastasia Siorenta. “Preparing Teachers to Integrate Web 2.0 in School Practice: Toward a Framework for Pedagogy 2.0.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 29, no. 2 (2013).
Jones, M. Gail, Ann Howe, and Melissa J. Rua. “Gender Differences in Students’ Experiences, Interests, and Attitudes toward Science and Scientists.” Science Education 84, no. 2 (March 2000): 180–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2<180::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-X.
Joolingen, Wouter R. van, and Zacharias C. Zacharia. “Developments in Inquiry Learning.” In Technology-Enhanced Learning, 21–37. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7_2.
Kapici, Hasan Ozgur, and Hakan Akcay. “Cognitive Theories of Learning on Virtual Science Laboratories.” Education Research Highlights in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2019, 107–26.
Logar, Ana, Cirila Peklaj, and Vesna Ferk Savec. “Effectiveness of Student Learning during Experimental Work in Primary School.” Acta Chimica Slovenica 64, no. 3 (2017).
Lu, Zisheng. “Analysis of China Students’ Laboratory Accidents in the Past 39 Years and the Laboratory Management Reform in the Future.” Education for Chemical Engineers 42 (January 2023): 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2022.12.001.
Lunetta, Vincent N, Avi Hofstein, and Michael P Clough. “Learning and Teaching in the School Science Laboratory: An Analysis of Research, Theory, and Practice.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, 393–441. Routledge, 2013.
Manyilizu, Majuto Clement. “Effectiveness of Virtual Laboratory vs. Paper-Based Experiences to the Hands-on Chemistry Practical in Tanzanian Secondary Schools.” Education and Information Technologies 28, no. 5 (May 11, 2023): 4831–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11327-7.
Mohammed, Abdullahi, T A Daniel, A R Lasisi, and C M Dania. “Effects of Virtual Laboratory Experiments on Students’ Academic Performance in Physics Practical.” British Journal of Education 8, no. 5 (2020): 26–39.
Ojetunde, S.M., A. M. Adebayo, and T. Sangodoyin. “Online Learning Platforms’ Induced Education Inequalities and Special Education Students’ Learning Attitude during Covid-19 Pandemic Homestay in the University of Ibadan.” Journal of Education and Practice 12, no. 23 (August 2021). https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/12-23-08.
Okafor, N P, R O Okunuga, and T O Ojo. “Effect of Virtual Chemistry Laboratory Sofware (VCLs) on Secondary School Students’ Achievement in Acid-Base Titrations Experiment.” Journal of the Nigerian Academy of Education 16, no. 2 (2020).
Oser, Rachel, and Barry J Fraser. “Effectiveness of Virtual Laboratories in Terms of Learning Environment, Attitudes and Achievement among High-School Genetics Students.” Curriculum and Teaching 30, no. 2 (2015): 65–80.
Papalazarou, Nikolaos, Ioannis Lefkos, and Nikolaos Fachantidis. “The Effect of Physical and Virtual Inquiry-Based Experiments on Students’ Attitudes and Learning.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 33, no. 3 (June 29, 2024): 349–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10088-3.
Pascoin, Alessandro Félix, and José Wilson P Carvalho. “Representações Quantitativas Em Laboratórios Virtuais Para o Ensino de Química.” Revista de Ensino, Educação e Ciências Humanas 22, no. 2 (2021): 152–59.
Potkonjak, Veljko, Michael Gardner, Victor Callaghan, Pasi Mattila, Christian Guetl, Vladimir M. Petrović, and Kosta Jovanović. “Virtual Laboratories for Education in Science, Technology, and Engineering: A Review.” Computers & Education 95 (April 2016): 309–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002.
Radhamani, Rakhi, Dhanush Kumar, Nijin Nizar, Krishnashree Achuthan, Bipin Nair, and Shyam Diwakar. “What Virtual Laboratory Usage Tells Us about Laboratory Skill Education Pre- and Post-COVID-19: Focus on Usage, Behavior, Intention and Adoption.” Education and Information Technologies 26, no. 6 (November 9, 2021): 7477–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10583-3.
Reeves, Shalaunda M., and Kent J. Crippen. “Virtual Laboratories in Undergraduate Science and Engineering Courses: A Systematic Review, 2009–2019.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 30, no. 1 (February 9, 2021): 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09866-0.
Santos, Marc Lancer, and Maricar Prudente. “Effectiveness of Virtual Laboratories in Science Education: A Meta-Analysis.” International Journal of Information and Education Technology 12, no. 2 (2022): 150–56. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.2.1598.
Stuckey-Mickell, Tracey A, and Bridget D Stuckey-Danner. “Virtual Labs in the Online Biology Course: Student Perceptions of Effectiveness and Usability.” MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 3, no. 2 (2007): 105–11.
Triejunita, Chessa Nur, Atina Putri, and Yusep Rosmansyah. “A Systematic Literature Review on Virtual Laboratory for Learning.” In 2021 International Conference on Data and Software Engineering (ICoDSE), 1–6. IEEE, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoDSE53690.2021.9648451.
Tüysüz, Cengiz. “The Effect of the Virtual Laboratory on Students’ Achievement and Attitude in Chemistry.” International Online Journal of Educational Sciences 2, no. 1 (2010): 37–53.
Ural, Evrim. “The Effect of Guided-Inquiry Laboratory Experiments on Science Education Students’ Chemistry Laboratory Attitudes, Anxiety and Achievement.” Journal of Education and Training Studies 4, no. 4 (2016): 217–27.
Yaki, Akawo Angwal, Mohammed Babagana, and Zainab Abubakar. “Effects of Virtual Laboratory Simulation Package and Demonstration Instructional Strategy on the Achievement of Secondary School Students in Biology,” 2020.
Segun Michael Ojetunde is a postdoctoral fellow, Center for Advanced Learning Technologies in STEAM (CALSTEAM), Department of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, University of Johannesburg, South Africa. He has a special interest in educational evaluation, science, and technology.
Ojetunde, Segun Michael. “A Systematic Review of Effectiveness and Factors Affecting the Usage of Virtual Science Laboratories in High Schools.” Journal of Education and Learning Technology 6, no. 9(2025): 696 – 713. https://doi.org/10.38159/jelt.2025691.
© 2025 The Author(s). Published and Maintained by Noyam Journals. This is an open access article under the CCBY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Featured
