The Translation of Ὑποκριτης in the Gospels as Osatotsε in Dangme Bible Translations

The Translation of Ὑποκριτης in the Gospels as Osatotsε in Dangme Bible Translations

Ebenezer Quaye & Jonathan Edward Tetteh Kuwornu-Adjaottor

Issue: Vol.6 No.7 2024 Article 3 pp.125-133
DOI : https://doi.org/10.38159/motbit.2024673 | Published online 30th December, 2024
© 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article under the CCBY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

238 Downloads

DOWNLOAD PDF

ABSTRACT

Translating from one language to another is a difficult task. Words, phrases and other expressions are socio-culturally or contextually defined and more so, they assume new meanings through both diachronic and synchronic time effects. The nuances in meaning when ideas are carried from one linguistic setting to another is another challenge in translation work. This becomes more challenging when one attempts to find equivalences in translations. This work looks at the word, osatotsε, being the Dangme word for the Greek, ὑποκριτης of the biblical text, especially, in the gospels. Osatotsε (O sa [kε]to tsε) in Dangme, literally or basically means “rotten (spoilt) but hidden owner (person).” Although this translation for all intents and purposes largely fits the contexts in which it is used, especially in the gospels, it does not fully translate the word, ὑποκριτης. This basically affects the interpretation of the texts in which osatotsε finds itself in terms of meaning and usage. This paper discusses ὑποκριτης and osatotsε by using lexical analysis and the mother-tongue to underscore the challenge of equivalence of translating words from one language into another. It emphasizes the need for a corresponding footnote (commentary) in subsequent publications of the Dangme Bible, Ngmami KlϽuklϽu Ͻ to the word, osatotsε to make its usage in preaching and teaching more efficient and effective. This work seeks to redefine the meaning of ὑποκριτης in Dangme translations although osatotsε, to a large extent but not absolutely, fits the contexts in which it is used in biblical texts, especially, in the gospels. This paper, therefore, puts forward that ὑποκριτης is a broader terminology as compared to osatotsε as an equivalence in Dangme translations.

Keywords: Osatotsε, ὑποκριτης, Equivalence, Dangme language, Linguistic analysis

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Baker, Mona. In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. Routledge, 2018.

Broeck, R. van den. “The Concept of Equivalence in Translation Theory: Some Critical Reflections.” In Literature and Translation, edited by J. S. Holmes, J. Lambert, and R. van den Broeck, 29–47. Leuven: Academic, 1978.

Catford, J.C. A Linguistic Theory of Translation. London: Oxford University Press, 1965.

Friberg, Barbara, and Timothy Friberg. “Καί.” Analytical Greek New Testament: Greek Text Analysis. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 1981.

Gentzler, E. Contemporary Translation Theories. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 2001.

Gingrich, F. Wilbur. Lexicon of the Greek New Testament. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.

House, J. Translation Quality Assessment: A Model Revisited. Tübingen: Narr, 1987.

Jakobson, Roman. “ On Linguistic Aspects of Translation.” In On Translation, 232–39. New York: Harvard University Press, 1975.

Koller, W. Einführung in Die Übersetzungswissenschaft. Heidelberg: Quelle and Meyer, 1979.

Lefevere, A. Translating Literature: Practice and Theory in a Comparative Literature Context. New York: The Modern Language Association of America, 1993.

Louw, Johannes, P., and Eugene A. Nida. Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: Based on Semantic Domains. 2nd ed. New York: United Bible Societies, 1989.

Malmkjaer, K. Linguistics and the Language of Translation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2005.

Munday, J. Introducing Translation Studies. London and New York: Routledge, 2000.

Newmark, Peter. “Approaches to Translation (Language Teaching Methodology Senes).” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7 (1) 114 (1981): 115.

Nida, Eugene Albert, and Charles Russell Taber. The Theory and Practice of Translation. Vol. 8. Brill Archive, 1974.

Panou, Despoina. “Equivalence in Translation Theories: A Critical Evaluation.” Theory & Practice in Language Studies (TPLS) 3, no. 1 (2013).

Pym, A. Exploring Translation Theories. London and New York: Routledge, 2010.

Snell-Hornby, M. Translation Studies: An Integrated Approach. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1988.

Thayer, Joseph Henry. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, 1889.

Vinay, Jean-Paul, and Jean Darbelnet. “Stylistique Comparée Du Français et de l’anglais: Méthode de Traduction.” (No Title), 1958.

Wallace, B. Daniel. New Testament: Introductions and Outlines. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1999.

AUTHOR(S)

Ebenezer Quaye, PhD in Theology (New Testament Studies) is a Senior Lecturer at the Department of Theological Studies, Valley View University. He is a known transformational author, speaker and influencer through his seminar, workshop, conference and other personal engagements as well as a discussant of diverse issues of global significance. He combines both academic and public speaking in a seamless manner to reach thousands across the world. As a biblicist, he researches in pistology, mother-tongue and translation issues, lexicography, leadership and other areas of global scope that transform societies.

Jonathan Edward Tetteh Kuwornu-Adjaottor, PhD, Associate Professor of New Testament and Mother-Tongue Biblical Hermeneutics, Department of Religious Studies, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi Ghana.

TO CITE ARTICLE

Quaye, Ebenezer, and Jonathan Edward Tetteh Kuwornu-Adjaottor. “ The Translation of Ὑποκριτης in the Gospels as Osatotsε in Dangme Bible Translations,” Journal of Mother-Tongue Biblical Hermeneutics and Theology 6, no.7 (2024):125-133. https://doi.org/10.38159/motbit.2024673